Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Coco Vandeweghe vs Laura Siegemund Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Vandeweghe vs Siegemund analysis and find out who is favored!
Want To Bet On The P1 vs P2 Match?
After checking out our Predictions and stats analysis, we recommend opening accounts at several Sportsbooks so you can get the best possible odds for the outcome. We recommend:
BetOnline
Our favorite for great odds and reliable service with a 50% Welcome Bonus (up to $1000) + 3 months FREE Matchstat*Bwin
Best for European users. Regional Welcome BonusesBetMGM
First bet offer, Get up to $1500 in bonuses if you don’t winSportsBetting
Competitive odds. First Deposit Doubled (up to $500) + 3 months FREE Matchstat*Cashwin
:Variety of betting options and 100% Welcome Bonus + 3 Months FREE Matchstat*- Bet365:
With competitive odds and live betting. Regional signup bonuses!
* To claim FREE Matchstat for 3 months – Click Here
If you’re not ready for real bets and want to practice, sign up for FREE at www.meerkatbet.com Enjoy simulated betting with our virtual currency, learn about value bets, and compete for monthly prizes in a risk-free environment.
Coco Vandeweghe vs Laura Siegemund Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Vandeweghe 4 - 2 Siegemund
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Vandeweghe has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Siegemund has won 47.53%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Vandeweghe, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Siegemund has won 57.73%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 42.06% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Vandeweghe has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Siegemund has saved 53.55% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Vandeweghe has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 2), with Siegemund winning 64.58% (W/L 31/ 17) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Vandeweghe has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 67% (W/L 70/ 34), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 45% (W/L 42/ 52). Siegemund has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 65% (W/L 339/ 181), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 50% (W/L 12/ 12).
- Player level: In the last year, Vandeweghe has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/ 1), where as Siegemund has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 69.57% of matches (W/L 16/ 7). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 6 times before with Vandeweghe winning 4 times and Siegemund being victorious 2 times. They have played 14 sets in total, with Vandeweghe winning 8 and Siegemund winning 6. The last match between Vandeweghe and Siegemund was at the BNP Paribas Open - Indian Wells, 06-03-2023, Q1 round, Hard with Laura Siegemund getting the victory 7-6(3) 6-3.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:34:14.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Vandeweghe and Siegemund have played a deciding set 2 times, with Vandeweghe winning 2 times and Siegemund 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Vandeweghe winning 0, and Siegemund 1.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Vandeweghe has played against opponents with an average rank of 358.5 while Siegemund has played against players with an average rank of 186.73.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Vandeweghe has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Siegemund has won 60% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Vandeweghe has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Siegemund has converted 49.24% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
815
Rank
9
High
32
Age
R
Plays
4
Total2
1
Hard2
3
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
72
Rank
27
High
36
Age
R
Plays
L
L
L
L
W
W
W
L
L
L
Form
L
W
W
W
L
W
W
L
L
L
52% (308-281)
Career Total W/L
60% (516-348)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
58% (18-13)
$4,045,196
Career Prize Money
$2,591,621
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Coco Vandeweghe vs Laura Siegemund For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Vandeweghe VS Siegemund
Get up to $1500 in bonuses if you don’t win!
Welcome bonuses
First Deposit Doubled
(Up to $500 is doubled on initial deposit)
+
Regional Signup Bonuses
With competitive adds and live betting
Vandeweghe VS Siegemund H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Coco Vandeweghe | Laura Siegemund |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 4 | 2 |
| Sets Won | 8 | 6 |
| Games Won | 70 | 59 |
| Aces (Total) | 27 | 7 |
| DFs Total | 29 | 16 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:34:14 | 1:34:14 |
| 1st Serve % | 56% (219/388) | 69% (254/369) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 70% (154/219) | 66% (168/254) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 46% (77/169) | 50% (57/115) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 43% (15/35) | 37% (15/41) |
| Return Points W% | 39% (144/369) | 40% (157/388) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 67% (4/6) | 33% (2/6) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (4/4) | 100% (2/2) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (4/0) | 0% (2/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (2/0) | 0% (4/0) |
Vandeweghe VS Siegemund H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(3) 6-3 |
Stats 
Laura Siegemund
Player
Coco Vandeweghe
76%
(
42 of
55)
1st Serve %
51%
(
44 of
86)
1
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
6
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
31 of
44)
85%
(
11 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
17 of
42)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
24%
(
13 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
38 of
86)
80
Total Points Won
61
|
||||
| 6-1 6-4 |
Stats
Laura Siegemund
Player
Coco Vandeweghe
70%
(
44 of
63)
1st Serve %
59%
(
35 of
59)
2
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
3
68%
(
30 of
44)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
24 of
35)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
33%
(
21 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
26 of
59)
68
Total Points Won
54
|
||||
| 6-4 6-4 |
Stats
Coco Vandeweghe
Player
Laura Siegemund
55%
(
39 of
71)
1st Serve %
67%
(
40 of
60)
5
Aces
2
11
Double Faults
4
67%
(
26 of
39)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
44%
(
14 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
44%
(
31 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
29 of
60)
69
Total Points Won
62
|
||||
| 6-4 4-6 6-3 |
Stats
Coco Vandeweghe
Player
Laura Siegemund
60%
(
52 of
87)
1st Serve %
63%
(
63 of
100)
7
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
7
73%
(
38 of
52)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
41 of
63)
51%
(
18 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
36%
(
31 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
42 of
100)
98
Total Points Won
89
|
||||
| 6-2 4-6 6-3 |
Stats
Coco Vandeweghe
Player
Laura Siegemund
58%
(
49 of
85)
1st Serve %
71%
(
65 of
91)
6
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
2
71%
(
35 of
49)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
42 of
65)
53%
(
19 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
36%
(
31 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
39 of
91)
93
Total Points Won
83
|
||||
| 6-1 6-1 | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Coco Vandeweghe | Laura Siegemund |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 58% (18/13) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 56% (43/34) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 52% (379/344) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 58% (7/5) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 65% (11/6) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0.05 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 17 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0.22 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 79 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 2:11:34 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 154.45 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 75% (1758/2345) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 57% (994/1758) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 48% (279/587) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 49% (163/331) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 48% (1168/2435) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 33% (1/2) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 60% (9/6) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (2/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 55% (6/5) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 58% (18/31) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 57% (4/7) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 53% (8/15) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 75% (16/12) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 25% (16/4) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 40% (15/6) |
Coco Vandeweghe Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Eva Lys
Player
Coco Vandeweghe
67%
(
39 of
58)
1st Serve %
37%
(
19 of
52)
1
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
4
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
12 of
19)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
10 of
33)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
36%
(
21 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
30 of
52)
67
Total Points Won
43
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Robin Montgomery
Player
Coco Vandeweghe
53%
(
39 of
73)
1st Serve %
40%
(
25 of
63)
9
Aces
10
9
Double Faults
11
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
18 of
25)
47%
(
16 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
38%
(
28 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
28 of
63)
73
Total Points Won
63
|
6-3 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Carol Zhao
Player
Coco Vandeweghe
78%
(
53 of
68)
1st Serve %
53%
(
41 of
78)
11
Aces
9
3
Double Faults
4
87%
(
46 of
53)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
29 of
41)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
14%
(
1 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
15 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
26 of
78)
79
Total Points Won
67
|
7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Coco Vandeweghe
Player
Barbora Palicova
57%
(
44 of
77)
1st Serve %
81%
(
50 of
62)
6
Aces
3
8
Double Faults
1
61%
(
27 of
44)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
30 of
50)
61%
(
20 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
39%
(
30 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
27 of
62)
74
Total Points Won
65
|
6-4 7-6(0) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Coco Vandeweghe
Player
Su Jeong Jang
49%
(
42 of
86)
1st Serve %
75%
(
69 of
92)
3
Aces
9
7
Double Faults
3
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
40 of
69)
50%
(
22 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
14 of
23)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
40%
(
34 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
38 of
92)
90
Total Points Won
88
|
6-3 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Xinyu Wang
Player
Coco Vandeweghe
61%
(
34 of
56)
1st Serve %
53%
(
30 of
57)
2
Aces
9
4
Double Faults
6
85%
(
29 of
34)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
22 of
30)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
17 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
22 of
57)
61
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Coco Vandeweghe
Player
Carol Zhao
55%
(
23 of
42)
1st Serve %
67%
(
32 of
48)
9
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
1
96%
(
22 of
23)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
9 of
16)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
21%
(
9 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
23 of
48)
56
Total Points Won
34
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Lena Papadakis
Player
Coco Vandeweghe
76%
(
35 of
46)
1st Serve %
51%
(
22 of
43)
5
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
7
80%
(
28 of
35)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
14 of
22)
45%
(
5 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
13 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
21 of
43)
54
Total Points Won
35
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Francesca Jones
Player
Coco Vandeweghe
68%
(
32 of
47)
1st Serve %
56%
(
34 of
61)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
66%
(
21 of
32)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
7 of
27)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
40%
(
19 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
34 of
61)
62
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Elvina Kalieva
Player
Coco Vandeweghe
60%
(
29 of
48)
1st Serve %
35%
(
17 of
49)
2
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
6
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
42%
(
8 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
9 of
32)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
38%
(
18 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
32 of
49)
62
Total Points Won
35
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Laura Siegemund Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Lauren Davis
Player
Laura Siegemund
63%
(
39 of
62)
1st Serve %
64%
(
46 of
72)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
1
64%
(
25 of
39)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
24 of
46)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
40%
(
25 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
36 of
72)
73
Total Points Won
61
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sofia Kenin
Player
Laura Siegemund
69%
(
57 of
83)
1st Serve %
61%
(
40 of
66)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
9
63%
(
36 of
57)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
37%
(
31 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
32 of
66)
84
Total Points Won
65
|
4-6 6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Viktoriya Tomova
Player
Laura Siegemund
66%
(
39 of
59)
1st Serve %
74%
(
53 of
72)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
62%
(
24 of
39)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
26 of
53)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
44%
(
26 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
40 of
72)
73
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Laura Siegemund
Player
Maria Camila Osorio Serrano
78%
(
64 of
82)
1st Serve %
74%
(
69 of
93)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
8
59%
(
38 of
64)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
36 of
69)
39%
(
7 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
45%
(
37 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
46 of
93)
91
Total Points Won
84
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Laura Siegemund
Player
Anna Blinkova
70%
(
45 of
64)
1st Serve %
57%
(
43 of
75)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
58%
(
26 of
45)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
18 of
43)
32%
(
6 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
11 of
32)
50%
(
8 of
16)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
50%
(
32 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
46 of
75)
78
Total Points Won
61
|
6-1 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Dayana Yastremska
Player
Laura Siegemund
48%
(
49 of
103)
1st Serve %
75%
(
62 of
83)
1
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
3
61%
(
30 of
49)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
32 of
62)
44%
(
24 of
54)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
73%
(
8 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
48%
(
49 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
43 of
83)
97
Total Points Won
89
|
4-6 7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Laura Siegemund
Player
Maria Lourdes Carle
82%
(
72 of
88)
1st Serve %
85%
(
77 of
91)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
56%
(
40 of
72)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
42 of
77)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
60%
(
6 of
10)
44%
(
39 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
46 of
91)
95
Total Points Won
84
|
2-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Laura Siegemund
Player
Julia Riera
77%
(
65 of
84)
1st Serve %
67%
(
40 of
60)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
51%
(
33 of
65)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
22 of
40)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
45%
(
38 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
33 of
60)
79
Total Points Won
65
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Laura Siegemund
Player
Beatrice Ricci
72%
(
43 of
60)
1st Serve %
42%
(
25 of
60)
0
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
9
65%
(
28 of
43)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
40%
(
24 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
33 of
60)
69
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Donna Vekic
Player
Laura Siegemund
61%
(
31 of
51)
1st Serve %
78%
(
39 of
50)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
31%
(
16 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
26 of
50)
61
Total Points Won
40
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Vandeweghe Vs Siegemund Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Vandeweghe are available here and Siegemund photos here.
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Laura Siegemund
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
